Forty free spins with no deposit at UK-licensed casinos: what the offer really costs
The marketing line for a no-deposit spins offer is short on purpose. “Forty free spins, no deposit needed” tells a player the entry price is zero and stops there. It does not say how much of any winnings the player keeps, how long the offer lasts, or what rule decides whether a single spin is even paid out. This page is built around those gaps. Every figure, limit and licence number below is taken from the Gambling Commission’s public register and from the operator terms the register points to — and where a number is not available, that absence is named rather than dressed up.

Currency note: the comparison below is current as of 7 November 2026, checked against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.
- The shape of a no-deposit spins offer in plain terms
- How wagering turns a small win into a smaller one
- The rule that protects the offer’s edge
- The role of the Gambling Commission licence
- How the public register identifies a licensed operator
- What responsible gambling rules apply to a no-deposit offer
- What happens to winnings when the player wants to cash out
- What the operator must check before the first spin
- Tax and what the player keeps
- What an offshore site looks like, and why it is not the same product
- The operators on the Gambling Commission register offering the relevant product
- How the wagering cap actually shapes the offer
- When the offer is not worth taking
- When the offer is worth taking
- What the page does not do
- What a reader should check before claiming
- Where the data ends
- Frequently asked questions
The shape of a no-deposit spins offer in plain terms
A “no-deposit” offer means the casino credits the spins before any money has moved. The player opens an account, the casino loads forty spins onto a named slot at a stated coin value, and the player runs them. No card is taken. No payment is queued. That part is genuinely free.

What is not free is what comes after. The casino almost always attaches two conditions to whatever the spins pay out. The first is a wagering requirement — the winnings have to be wagered a stated number of times before they become withdrawable cash. The second is a maximum-win cap — even after wagering is cleared, there is a ceiling on what the offer will pay. Both are standard in the UK licensed market. Both are the reason the headline “free” needs to be read twice.
The number forty is a market midpoint. Operators tend to credit either twenty or fifty when they want to look generous; forty sits between those two, and several of the casinos reviewed below do offer a forty-spin package alongside shorter or longer versions. Nothing about forty is intrinsically better or worse than thirty or sixty — what matters is what the casino asks the player to do with what the spins produce.
A useful way to think of the offer: the spins are the door. Wagering, the cap, the time limit and the eligible slot are the room behind it.
How wagering turns a small win into a smaller one
Wagering is the part most players under-weight. A casino offering forty free spins with no deposit typically credits any winnings as bonus funds, not as cash. The player then has to wager those bonus funds a fixed number of times before they convert to withdrawable cash. If the requirement is thirty times and the win is £4, the player must place £120 of qualifying bets before the £4 becomes theirs to take out.

The upper bound on that requirement changed for the UK market in late 2025. Since 19 December 2025, no Gambling Commission licensee can attach a wagering requirement higher than ten times the bonus amount to a casino promotion. That rule sets a ceiling; it does not set a floor, and a casino is free to set wagering at any multiple at or below that ceiling. The effect is that the worst case in the licensed UK market is now ten times — still a meaningful sum against a no-deposit win, but not the thirty-or-forty-times figure that was common before the cap.
A worked example makes the cost concrete. Imagine a casino credited forty free spins at 10p each on a slot with a 96% return to player, attached a ten-times wagering requirement, and capped the maximum withdrawal from the offer at £50. A player who happened to win £4 from the spins would need to place £40 of further bets to clear the wagering — at 96% RTP, that £40 of bets would on average return £38.40, leaving a real expected loss of about £1.60 just to unlock the original £4 win. The point is not that £1.60 is large; it is that a “free” win of £4 turns into about £2.40 of cash in hand, with the rest absorbed by the wagering round. That arithmetic is what the headline never mentions.
The cap on the offer matters too. Where a casino sets a £50 maximum withdrawal on winnings from a no-deposit spins package, anything above £50 from the original spins is forfeited at conversion — a feature of the offer, not a bug, and one that the operator’s terms page will state in the small print.
The rule that protects the offer’s edge
Online slots in Great Britain run inside a set of mechanical rules that apply whether the player paid for the spin or received it free. Two of those rules matter most for a no-deposit package.
The first is the maximum stake per game cycle. From 9 April 2025, the stake ceiling for players aged 25 and over is £5 per game cycle; from 21 May 2025, players aged 18 to 24 are limited to £2 per game cycle. A “game cycle” is the full sequence from one bet to the next — spin, resolution, next spin. This ceiling is enforced by the slot software itself at any Gambling Commission–licensed site. It caps how fast a bonus balance can be wagered through, which in turn caps how much of the wagering requirement a player can clear in a single sitting.
The second is the speed of play. Since 31 October 2021, automatic play (auto-play) is banned on UK-licensed slots, and each spin must take at least 2.5 seconds from bet to result. The rule was introduced to slow the rate at which a player can work through a bonus balance; for a no-deposit package it has the same effect — the wagering round cannot be rushed.
A third rule shapes the offer’s edge less directly but bites when it matters: any feature that disguises a loss as a win is banned on UK-licensed slots. A spin that returns less than the stake but is presented on screen with celebratory graphics is, in effect, a loss — and the operator cannot present it as anything else.
The role of the Gambling Commission licence
Every casino offering forty free spins with no deposit to a player in Great Britain must hold a Gambling Commission remote casino operating licence. There is no exception. The Commission’s public register is the place to verify this; the licence number appears on the operator’s site, usually in the footer, and the same number can be looked up on the register to confirm it is active and attached to the company named on the site.
The Commission does not only license. It also sets the technical standards the slots and the casino software must meet (the Remote Technical Standards), publishes the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP) every licensee is bound by, and runs the social responsibility code that defines the player-protection rules. When a casino credits forty free spins to a UK player, it is doing so inside that frame — and the rules above (the stake ceiling, the spin speed, the wagering cap) are part of the frame.
A practical test for a reader: take the licence number from the casino’s site footer, paste it into the register’s search box, and check three things — that the licence status is “Active”, that the licence type is “Remote Casino Operating Licence”, and that the trading name on the licence matches the brand the player opened the account with. If any of those three does not line up, the right answer is not to play.
How the public register identifies a licensed operator
The Gambling Commission’s public register is downloadable as CSV or Excel, and as of 18 September 2026 it listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence. The domain list inside the register records each website against the licence account that runs it, with a status of Active, Inactive or White Label; on the same date the register held 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries. A white-label site trades under another company’s licence — the brand on the front of the site and the company on the licence can be different names.
A remote casino licence number on the register has a fixed shape: AccountNumber-R-Number-Suffix. The leading six digits repeat the licence holder’s account number, the “R” marks a remote (online) licence, and the suffix distinguishes one licence from another held by the same account. So a number like 045322-R-324275-019 reads as: account 45322, remote licence, the nineteenth such licence on that account. The pattern is consistent across every licensee; once a reader has seen one, every other number on the register reads the same way.
What responsible gambling rules apply to a no-deposit offer
A no-deposit spins package is, for regulatory purposes, exactly the same bet as one paid for in cash. The safer-gambling rules that apply to any other stake apply to this one. The implication is straightforward: a player who has self-excluded cannot receive these spins and cannot withdraw anything from them. The tools below are the ones that bind every UK-licensed casino.
GAMSTOP is the national online self-exclusion scheme, and it has been a mandatory condition of every Gambling Commission online operating licence since 31 March 2020. A player registers with GAMSTOP and chooses a self-exclusion period of six months, one year or five years. The exclusion cannot be cancelled early. Every UK-licensed casino checks new accounts against GAMSTOP at registration, and a player who has self-excluded cannot open an account, cannot receive promotional credits, and cannot withdraw anything from a bonus balance. The forty free spins on offer at a UK-licensed casino are blocked by GAMSTOP in the same way as a £500 deposit would be.
Financial vulnerability checks are another layer. From 28 February 2025, a licensee must run a light-touch financial vulnerability check at £150 of net deposits in any rolling 30-day period, using publicly available data only. The check is not a credit check; it is a flag for unusual financial pressure. Where the flag trips, the operator is expected to interact with the player and may set a deposit ceiling. A no-deposit offer sits at the entry to the account, before the £150 threshold is anywhere near reached — so the check applies once the player moves on to paid play, not at the moment the spins are credited.
The wider financial risk assessments were announced but have not yet come into force at the date of writing. When they do, they will run on a fuller data set and at different thresholds.
Deposit-limit prompts are mandatory. From 31 October 2025, before a player’s first deposit the operator must prompt them to set a financial limit. The player can decline, but the prompt must happen; the rule exists because research consistently showed that players who never set a limit at the start of an account tend to set one only after a loss. A no-deposit offer runs ahead of that prompt — there is no deposit to set a limit against — but the moment the player makes a real-money deposit, the prompt fires.
Reality checks and time-outs are also standard. A reality check is a pop-up that appears at fixed intervals during play and states how long the player has been in the session and how much they have won or lost. Time-out is a short self-exclusion — twenty-four hours, one week, one month — that the player can set themselves without going through GAMSTOP.
GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline (0808 8020 133), and GambleAware funds treatment and education across Great Britain. Both are signposted from every licensed operator’s safer-gambling page.
What happens to winnings when the player wants to cash out
A no-deposit spins offer pays out, when it pays out, through the same withdrawal route as any other win at the same casino. The specific methods vary by operator, but the framework is set by the Commission’s rules and by the underlying payment rails.
UK bank transfers run through the Faster Payments Service, which has been live since 2008 and is operated by Pay.UK. The scheme runs twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, and most payments arrive instantly or within a couple of minutes; transfers can occasionally take up to two hours. The Faster Payments scheme sets a £1,000,000 per-transaction limit, though individual banks impose lower limits on their own customers. The Bank of England is not a direct participant in Faster Payments but oversees the system’s safety and stability and provides final settlement. For a player, the practical point is that once a UK-licensed casino releases a withdrawal, the money moves fast — the delay, where there is one, is on the casino’s side, not the bank’s.
Debit cards are accepted for deposits at every UK-licensed online casino. Credit cards have been banned for gambling across all online and offline gambling products in Great Britain since 14 April 2020, including credit cards routed through e-wallets. The Commission’s evidence at the time included an estimate that around 800,000 UK consumers used credit cards to gamble in 2018, and a finding that 22% of online gamblers who used credit cards to gamble were classed as problem gamblers. Debit cards and bank transfers were not affected by the ban.
Apple Pay is available at several UK-licensed casinos. The service was launched on 20 October 2014 (initially for US-issued cards only) and began supporting UK-issued payment cards on 14 July 2015. It protects card data through tokenization, replacing the actual card number with a device-specific tokenised Device Primary Account Number and generating a dynamic security code for each transaction. In-store payments use near-field communication, but online casino deposits use the in-app payment flow rather than NFC. Apple states that a supported card from a participating card issuer is required, and that Apple Pay is not available in all markets; on an iPhone with Face ID, an Apple Pay purchase is authenticated by double-clicking the side button, on Touch ID models by double-clicking the Home button. From a regulatory standpoint, an Apple Pay deposit is treated as a card payment — so it falls under the credit-card ban if the underlying funding card is a credit card, and under the debit-card rules if it is a debit card.
AstroPay is a global digital wallet offering online payments, virtual and physical debit cards and peer-to-peer transfers; it was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Uruguay. Its UK entity, Larstal Limited, is an electronic money institution authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011. AstroPay also operates licensed entities on the Isle of Man, in Brazil and in Denmark. From a casino player’s standpoint, AstroPay deposits are treated as e-money transactions, not card transactions — but the casino’s own deposit policy will state whether the bonus terms treat an e-money deposit the same as a debit-card deposit, and that is what to check.
The general withdrawal rule across the licensed UK market is: a player must withdraw to the same method they deposited with, where that method supports withdrawals, and the casino must run Know Your Customer checks before releasing funds. The KYC checks are the reason a first withdrawal is often slower than a first deposit.
What the operator must check before the first spin
UK-licensed casinos verify name, address and date of birth before the first deposit or any play, and have done so since 7 May 2019. The rule exists to enforce the minimum age of 18 and to support anti-money-laundering obligations. The verification is not optional and cannot be skipped by paying in.
A second implication of the same rule is that anonymous play is not possible at a UK-licensed site. A player who wants to use only the no-deposit spins without ever depositing can still do so, but the account is registered in their real name from the start. There is no “try before you identify” mode.
A third implication is that a player who self-excludes via GAMSTOP cannot receive the spins. The GAMSTOP check runs at registration; if it trips, the account is blocked.
Tax and what the player keeps
Players pay no tax on gambling winnings in the UK. This holds for slot wins, sports bets, lottery wins and poker tournament wins. The tax is on the operator: Remote Gaming Duty applies to gross gaming yield, and was raised from 21% to 40% from 1 April 2026. The operator’s tax position is not the player’s problem, but it does mean the licensed UK market has become more expensive for operators to run, which feeds back into the size and shape of the promotional offers they can afford to credit.
What an offshore site looks like, and why it is not the same product
The Gambling Act 2005 covers Great Britain, and section 33 of the Act makes it an offence to provide gambling to people in Great Britain without a Commission licence. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, the location of the operator is irrelevant — any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Commission licence. A Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar licence is not a substitute for a UK one.
The Commission disrupts unlicensed sites through cease-and-desist notices, search-engine delisting, and referrals to payment and hosting providers, but does not have the power to block sites at the ISP level. There is no penalty aimed at the player. What the player loses on an unlicensed site is protection — no GAMSTOP, no Commission complaints route, no approved ADR.
A practical test: a site that offers forty free spins with no deposit but does not name a Gambling Commission licence number in its footer, or names a number that does not resolve to “Active” on the Commission’s public register, is not offering the product this page describes.
The operators on the Gambling Commission register offering the relevant product
What follows is a side-by-side read of ten brands on the Gambling Commission’s public register, each of which holds an active remote casino operating licence. The list is drawn from the register, not from a marketing ranking, and the order is alphabetical by brand. Several brands share one licensee — Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo all sit under LC International Limited, for example — and they are not presented here as independent operators. Every GB-licensed online operator must take part in GAMSTOP.
| Brand | Licence holder | GB remote casino licence | Domain status | Subject support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32Red | Platinum Gaming Limited | 045322-R-324275-019 | Active | — |
| Midnite | Dribble Media Limited | 042647-R-321653-022 | Active | — |
| Sky Vegas | Bonne Terre Gaming Limited | 065519-R-339675-002 | Active | — |
| Jackpotjoy | Gamesys Operations Limited | 038905-R-319430-022 | Active | — |
| BetVictor | BV Gaming Limited | 039576-R-319370-028 | Active | — |
| Casumo | Recro Limited | 061549-R-336718-002 | Active | — |
| Coral | LC International Limited | 054743-R-330863-014 | Active | — |
| Unibet | Platinum Gaming Limited | 045322-R-324275-019 | Active | — |
| Paddy Power | PPB Games Limited | 039411-R-319335-010 | Active | — |
| bet365 | Hillside (UK Gaming) ENC | 055149-R-331499-004 | Active | — |
The right-hand column reads “—” across the board, and that is the honest answer here. The register confirms each brand is licensed to operate a remote casino in Great Britain. It does not confirm that any specific brand currently credits forty free spins with no deposit to a new account, and the Commission’s published data does not break the promotional offering down by brand in the way this column would need. Where a reader wants to know whether a specific brand is running a forty-spin offer this week, the right place to check is the brand’s own promotions page, against the register entry above.
Two patterns are worth naming. The first is that two of the ten brands above — 32Red and Unibet — sit under the same licence number, because they are both operated by Platinum Gaming Limited. A reader who treats them as independent competitors is partly right and partly wrong: the products and promotions may differ, but the licence is one. The second is that several of the brands above (Sky Vegas, bet365, Paddy Power, BetVictor) are better known as sportsbooks than as casino brands, and their casino verticals are the relevant product for a slots-led no-deposit offer.
The table above is what the register carries. What it does not carry is a judgment on the offer itself; that is the next section’s job.
How the wagering cap actually shapes the offer
The wagering cap that came into force on 19 December 2025 is the single biggest change to the licensed UK no-deposit market in years. Before the cap, wagering requirements of thirty, forty or even sixty times the bonus amount were not unusual. After the cap, no licensee can attach a wagering requirement higher than ten times the bonus amount to a casino promotion. A casino offering forty free spins with no deposit can still attach a wagering requirement — the cap is on the multiple, not on the existence of the requirement — but the multiple cannot exceed ten.
To put the cap into a numerical frame, take a no-deposit package with a stated bonus value of £4 (the kind of figure forty spins at 10p each tends to produce on a moderate-volatility slot). At ten times wagering, the player must place £40 of qualifying bets to convert the bonus to cash. The casino is not obliged to set the wagering at ten — it can set lower, and many will — but the ceiling is now ten.
The cap also closes off the mixed-product bonus structure. Since 19 December 2025, mixed-product bonuses — a free bet on sport that credits casino spins, or a sportsbook offer that bundles a casino promotion — are banned. A player who wants casino spins has to take them as a casino offer, not as part of a sportsbook welcome package. The change tightens the boundary between products and removes a class of promotion that was hard for a player to evaluate on the casino terms alone.
A worked range, against the cap, looks like this. Assume forty spins at 10p each on a 96% RTP slot. The expected return from the spins alone is £4 × 0.96 = £3.84, before any wagering. At a ten-times wagering requirement, the player must place £40 of further bets to convert any winnings to cash; at a 96% RTP, the expected loss on that wagering round is £40 × 0.04 = £1.60. The expected cash-in-hand from the original spins, after the wagering round, is therefore in the band of £3.84 minus £1.60, or roughly £2.20 to £2.40 against an offer worth £4 in nominal spin value. The lower end of the band assumes the player converts at the minimum qualifying stake; the upper end assumes the maximum stake per game cycle (£5 for players aged 25 and over, £2 for players aged 18 to 24). The exact figure depends on the stake the player chooses and on the slot’s actual return in their session, but the band is the right shape: the player keeps a clear majority of the nominal value of the spins but does not keep all of it.
The offer’s headline number and the player’s actual expected return are two different numbers, and the gap between them is the wagering cost.
When the offer is not worth taking
A no-deposit spins offer is a free trial of the casino’s slots and platform, and the wagering round is the price the player pays to convert the trial to cash. There are three situations where the price is high enough to make the offer a poor choice.
The first is when the wagering requirement is at the cap — ten times — and the slot’s RTP is below the market average of 96%. Below 96%, the wagering round eats a larger fraction of the bonus, and the conversion value drops sharply. A casino attaching a 94% RTP slot to a ten-times wagering offer is offering the player a worse deal than one attaching a 96% RTP slot to the same offer, even though the headline is identical.
The second is when the maximum-win cap is low. A £20 cap on winnings from a no-deposit offer makes any spin outcome above £20 effectively worthless, even if the spin returns more. The cap binds at conversion, not at the spin. A player who wins £30 from the spins on an offer with a £20 cap converts £20 — and the £10 above the cap is forfeited. The cap is the second silent cost in the offer.
The third is when the time limit is short. No-deposit offers typically expire in twenty-four to seventy-two hours from credit. A player who does not run the spins inside the window loses both the spins and any pending winnings. The shorter the window, the more the offer rewards a player who can sit down and play straight away, and the worse it suits a player who wants to come back to it.
When the offer is worth taking
The offer is worth taking when the wagering is well below the cap, when the cap is high enough to cover a plausible win, when the eligible slot has a competitive RTP, and when the time window fits the player’s schedule. None of those four conditions are guaranteed, and the operator’s promotions page is the place to confirm them. The point is not that a no-deposit offer is a bad product on average — it is that its real value depends on terms the headline does not state.
The offer is also worth taking as a platform test. Forty free spins is enough play to judge whether the casino’s software runs well on the player’s device, whether the slot catalogue is interesting, and whether the registration and verification flow is smooth. If the player is going to deposit and play anyway, the no-deposit spins are a free way to find that out before committing real money.
What the page does not do
This page does not recommend a specific brand. The operators above are described, not endorsed. They are ten of 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence on the Gambling Commission’s register at the date of writing, and the register is the source of the licence numbers in the table. Which of the ten a reader chooses is a question the reader has to answer, and the right basis for that choice is the reader’s own priorities — the slot they want to play, the deposit method they prefer, the wagering multiple they are willing to clear.
This page also does not rank the offer. There is no first place and no last place. A ranking of no-deposit spins offers is the kind of page the market is full of, and it is the kind of page that changes the moment any one operator adjusts its terms; the ranking is not what this page is for. What it is for is making the cost of the offer legible, so the reader can compare the offers themselves.
This page also does not provide a bonus code, voucher or affiliate link. The promotional value of a no-deposit offer is in its terms, not in how it is claimed, and the reader is better served by reading the terms than by following a code.
What a reader should check before claiming
A short checklist, drawn from the rules above:
- The licence number in the casino’s footer resolves to “Active” on the Gambling Commission’s public register.
- The licence type is “Remote Casino Operating Licence” — not a software licence, not a lottery licence, not a white-label-only entry.
- The eligible slot and its RTP are named in the offer terms.
- The wagering requirement is stated as a multiple (no more than ten times under the current cap).
- The maximum-win cap is stated as a cash figure.
- The expiry window is stated in hours.
- The deposit method that will be used to withdraw (if the player converts any winnings) is supported by the casino and is not a credit card.
- The player is not currently self-excluded via GAMSTOP, and is over 18.
These eight items cover the offer, the operator and the player. They take about five minutes to work through. They are the difference between claiming an offer that returns what its headline promises and claiming one that quietly returns a fraction of it.
Where the data ends
Two boundaries on this page are worth naming.
The first is that the Gambling Commission’s public register changes. The figures cited here — 139 active remote casino operating licence accounts, 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries — are the register’s state on 18 September 2026. The register is updated continuously, and the right place to confirm a current licence status is the register itself.
The second is that the wagering cap is a ceiling, not a market norm. The market is free to settle at any multiple up to ten, and the actual distribution across UK-licensed casinos at the date of writing is not something this page measures. The cap is the worst case. The typical case is lower, and is the figure a player should ask the operator for directly.
A note on language. British spelling is used throughout (licence as a noun, license as a verb, -ise endings). Currency is written £ before the figure. Dates are written day-month-year, except where a research-cited date pins to a specific past event and is given as the source gives it.
Frequently asked questions
What does “40 free spins with no deposit” actually mean?
It means the casino credits forty spins on a named slot before any money is taken from the player. The spins are usually set at a fixed coin value (commonly 10p), and any winnings from the spins are credited as bonus funds subject to the offer’s wagering requirement, maximum-win cap and expiry window. The “no deposit” part refers to entry, not to the conditions attached to anything the spins pay out.
Are there wagering requirements on winnings from 40 free spins?
Yes — in nearly every case. A UK-licensed casino offering forty no-deposit spins almost always attaches a wagering requirement to the winnings, expressed as a multiple of the bonus amount. Since 19 December 2025 the multiple is capped at ten times for any casino promotion. A casino can set wagering lower than ten, but cannot set it higher. The wagering round is the cost the player pays to convert the bonus to withdrawable cash.
Is there a maximum win cap on 40 no-deposit free spins?
Most licensed UK casinos attach a maximum-win cap to a no-deposit spins offer. The cap is a stated cash figure (for example £20 or £50) above which any winnings from the spins are forfeited at conversion. The cap binds at conversion, not at the spin: a player who wins above the cap on a single spin still only converts up to the cap. The exact figure is set by the operator and stated in the offer terms.
Does GAMSTOP self-exclusion cover a 40 free spins offer?
Yes. GAMSTOP self-exclusion has been a mandatory condition of every Gambling Commission online operating licence since 31 March 2020. A player who has registered with GAMSTOP for a six-month, one-year or five-year period cannot open an account at a UK-licensed casino, cannot receive promotional credits, and cannot withdraw anything from a bonus balance. The exclusion cannot be cancelled early. A no-deposit spins offer is blocked by GAMSTOP in the same way as a paid stake would be.
How long do 40 no-deposit free spins stay valid once credited?
The expiry window is set by the operator and stated in the offer terms; twenty-four to seventy-two hours is typical. Any unplayed spins and any bonus balance pending at the end of the window are forfeited. The window is one of the four conditions that determine whether the offer is worth claiming, alongside the wagering requirement, the maximum-win cap and the eligible slot’s RTP. A short window rewards a player who can play straight away and penalises one who wants to come back to it later.
Must a casino be licensed by the Gambling Commission to offer 40 free spins with no deposit to UK players?
Yes. Any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where the operator is based. Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005 makes it an offence to provide gambling to people in Great Britain without a Commission licence, and the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 closed the previous route by which an offshore operator could serve the UK market on a home-country licence. The licence number is in the casino’s footer and can be verified on the Commission’s public register.
